San Antonio The fact that the term “provisional dismissal” in its technical sense applies only to criminal cases92 is not an argument for the solar team to withdraw the complaint in the intervention. It doesn`t seem that the image team and the solar team wanted to use the term in its technical sense. Since the parties agreed, in paragraph 21, that the compromise agreement “served as a total waiver and discharge of certain claims, counter-claims, pleas, claims and claims of any kind that each may have against the other”, the parties intended to terminate all cases they had filed against each other. P1,015,425.06 – the sixty days or days following the date of signature of this Agreement; Provided that Felix Co/[Team Image] does not make the corresponding retrospective test; and the provisional rejection of offences punishable by imprisonment of six (6 years) or a fine of any amount or both, becomes permanent one (1) year after the delivery of the order, without the case having been revived. For offences punishable by more than six (6) years` imprisonment, their provisional release becomes permanent two (2) years after the delivery of the order, without the case having been resuscitated. Accordingly, [Solar Team] is responsible for depositing the amount of P2 million pesos within ten (10) days of receipt of this order with the office of the Registrar of the Regional Trial Court of Makati City, which was not definitively decided until after the final determination of the commitments of [Team Image and Felix S. Co] in accordance with the compromise agreement and after the issue of [Solar Team`s] breach of the same agreement has been definitively resolved for failure to dismiss civil proceeding No. 97-024. UNDER THAT LAW, the Court carried out an examination of the premises. .
GRANTS [Team Image`s] Request for the issuance of a notice of performance accompanied by its prayer for an injunction allowing the suspension of payment and injunctions [Solar Team] to comply with paragraphs 21 and 22 of the compromise agreement enforced therein by the parties. The court stated that the above-mentioned judgment might not apply in a case where the alleged offences are very serious and serious offences with social implications, such as the offences referred to in Articles 307 of the IPC and 25/27 of the Arms Act, etc. The Board therefore found that the High Court had erred in mechanically annsing the FIRs, finding that, in view of the compromise, there was no chance of conviction and/or that the continuation of the proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The Bank also stated: 8. Felix Co/[Team Image] also agrees, William Tieng, in the execution of this agreement, fifty percent (50%) of the amount of TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY[-]EIGHT THOUSAND HUNDRED AND SEVENTY PESOS (P278,670.00) that he had paid to Sycip Gorres & Velayo (SGV), to be reimbursed by his fees or the sum of one hundred and thirty-thirty pesos.] nine thousand thirty-thirty-five pesos (P139.335). When the Image team refused to do an accounting, Solar Team filed a complaint against Team Image and its president Co in the Makati Regional Court.11 The case was drawn at Division 59, presided over by Judge Winlove M. .